| EXPLORING CHRISTIANITY - CROSS |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
THE
BIBLE EYEWITNESS GOD
- MAN RESURRECTION RELIGIONS SUFFERING TRINITY SCIENCE FORGIVENESS GUIDANCE REPENTANCE BORN
AGAIN SAVING
FAITH ASSURANCE TRUTH MORALITY THE
CHURCH PURPOSE IDENTITY SELF-ESTEEM LIFE AFTER DEATHChristianity's Hope & Challenge. THE CROSS Grace
|
The cross in the New Testament letters When
we come to the letters of the New Testament, we find a very interesting
thing. You would have thought that with someone who had lived such a wonderful
life, such as no one else has ever lived before or since, that there would
have been lots of things the writers of these letters could have written
about. They could have written about his great compassion and the way
he mixed with the outcasts of society; his remarkable healing ministry
to the lame, the lepers, the blind, the tormented and even how, on occasions,
he raised the dead; the confident authority with which he spoke and the
wisdom of his teaching which has been unsurpassed, or the confident and
unassuming way in which he challenged the civil and religious rulers of
his day. We have a full account of all these things in the four Gospels,
but they hardly get another mention in the rest of the New Testament. Another interesting thing to note is that all the emphasis here is on the fact that he died for “us” or “for our sins”. Consider the following phrases that are typical of what we find: He died “for many” (Mark 10:45); “for the ungodly” (Romans 5:6); “for us” (5:8); “for us all” (8:32); “for you ” (1 Corinthians 11:24); “for our sins” (15:3); “for all” (2 Corinthians 5:14); “for me” (Galatians 2:20); “for her [the church]” (Ephesians 5:25); “to do away with sin”(Hebrews 9:26); “to take away the sins of many” (9:28); “for sins” (1 Peter 3:18); “for the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2).
The different words that are used in the Greek language in which the New Testament was written, which are translated “for” in this context in our English translations, are significant. Four different words are used, huper, peri, anti and dia. Huper is the most common and is used 26 times in this way. It has the meaning “in behalf of, for the sake of someone or something”, though many times it is shown by its context to be used in the sense of “instead of”. For example, Paul wanted to keep Onesimus in Rome to serve him “on behalf of” his master Philemon, that is, “in his place” (Philemon 13). This meaning, in relation to the cross, is particularly clear in passages such as 2 Corinthians 5:21 and Galatians 3:13. Peri, used 6 times, usually has the meaning “with regard to, with reference to”. According to the Arndt-Gingrich lexicon, when used with the Greek word for “sin” it has the sense “to take away, to atone for”. Anti is used three times in connection with the Greek word lutron, “a ransom” (Matthew 20:28; Mark 10:45; 1 Timothy 2:6). It has the primary meaning “instead of, in place of”, though it can develop into “in behalf of ”, similar in meaning to huper. Leon Morris, in The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross, comments: “The most common meaning of the preposition, both inside the New Testament and out, is ‘instead of’ or ‘in exchange for’.”Dia is used once in this context (Romans 4:25). It has the meaning “because of”. So it could be said, in summary, that Christ died “on our behalf”, “for our sake”, or “instead of us”, or “with regard to”, “with reference to”, or “because of” our sins, or to “take them away”. Patricia Hampl, in I Could Tell You Stories, says that redemption requires that radical evil and radical atonement collide. This happened on the cross. The eminent theologian, Karl Barth, in his Church Dogmatics, IV, summed up the New Testament use of these prepositions as pointing to Christ’s “activity as our Representative and Substitute.” He says: They cannot be understood if—quite apart from the particular view of the atonement made in Him which dominates these passages—we do not see that in general these prepositions speak of a place which ought to be ours, that we ought to have taken this place, that we have been taken from it, that it is occupied by another, that this other acts in this place as only He can, in our cause and interest, that we cannot add to anything that He does there because the place where we might do so is occupied by Him, that anything further which might happen can result only from what is done by Him in our place and in our cause. Concerning
this emphasis John Stott, in Our Guilty Silence, says: Another significant emphasis is that which is placed on “the blood of Christ”. Jesus himself, during his last meal with his disciples, had spoken of “my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins” (Matthew 26:28). Earlier, he had declared that it was through the appropriation of his blood that we receive eternal life and enjoy a close relationship with him (John 6:53-56). This way of speaking of Christ’s death occurs about thirty times in the New Testament. In the letters it is the most common way of doing so.
God
had forbidden his people to eat the flesh of animals that still contained
the blood, “because the life of every creature is its blood”
(Leviticus 17:14). We now know the truth of that statement. Our bodies
contain something like one hundred trillion cells, each of which requires
a constant supply of oxygen, amino acids, nitrogen, sodium, potassium,
calcium, magnesium, sugars, lipids, cholesterols, and hormones. All these
are carried on tiny rafts of blood cells which have access to every living
cell in the body through minute capillaries. Each cell has its own drawing
rights and extracts what it needs to fuel its amazingly complex chemical
reactions. Without the life-giving quality of the blood the cells would
very quickly die. Obviously, “the life of the flesh is the blood”!
When Jesus spoke of his blood being “poured out”,
he was referring to his life, the life of God himself, voluntarily given
for us. Leon Morris, in The Atonement: Its Meaning and Significance,
showed very clearly that this term “blood” denotes a life
laid down in a violent, sacrificial death. Oswald Chambers made this comment: It is significant in this respect that the Hebrew word for blood occurs 362 times in the Old Testament. In 203 of these instances it refers to death with violence of some kind. In 103 instances it refers to sacrificial blood, 78 of these occurring in Leviticus and Exodus. When the Hebrews heard the word ‘blood’, the most likely association to be conjured up would be that of violent death. Another function of blood is its cleansing properties. Each cell in the body needs to get rid of its potentially hazardous waste products such as carbon dioxide, urea and uric acid. It is the blood cells that have this cleansing action, removing these wastes to the kidneys. The heart of a 70kg man will pump about six litres per minute. Twenty percent of this flows through the kidneys, which distil some thirty chemicals and promptly return ninety-nine percent of the volume back into the bloodstream, sending the remaining one percent off to the bladder for expulsion. These remarkable blood cells survive for a quarter-million circuits and are then nudged to the liver and spleen for one last unloading. They are picked clean and broken down into amino acids and bile pigment for recycling. Every second the bone marrow produces another four million blood cells to replace these. So the cleansing nature of blood also provides us with a very appropriate metaphor for the cross. The missionary doctor Paul Brand, who did some wonderful pioneering surgical work restoring dignity to patients deformed by leprosy, wrote the book In His Image, together with Philip Yancey, on this remarkable body God has given us. He says: I used to think it strange that the Bible keeps talking about the cleansing power of the blood (1 Peter 1:2). It seemed to me that the blood was messy stuff. I needed to wash my white lab coats if they became stained with blood. Today I love the analogy; it is so true of the body. The blood is constantly cleansing every cell, and washing away all the debris that accumulates all the time. Consider the following statements: We have
been bought by his blood (Acts 20:28). There appears, also, to be a progressive revelation of the remission of sin through the shedding of blood in the Bible. In the case of Abel, the blood was sufficient for the forgiveness of one man (Genesis 4:4). During the first Passover, the blood of the lamb on the doorpost was sufficient to protect a whole family (Exodus 12:3). When the tabernacle was constructed, on the Day of Atonement the blood of one goat was sufficient to atone for the guilt of the nation (Leviticus 16:15, 16). But in the case of Jesus, the Lamb of God, the blood shed on the cross was sufficient for “the sins of the whole world” (1 John 2:2). I believe J. Behm got the New Testament emphasis on blood in this context right when he said: “‘Blood of Christ’ is like ‘cross’, only another, clearer expression for the death of Christ in its salvation meaning.”
Because
I like stories, I will finish with three short ones. John Bunyan, the
author of Pilgrim’s Progress, which has probably gone through more
editions than any other book in history after the Bible, wrote in his
later book, Grace Abounding: When
the multimillionaire J. P. Morgan died, it was found that he had made
his will a year before his death. It consisted of 10,000 words, and contained
37 articles. Some of his financial transactions had involved such large
sums of money that they disturbed the financial equilibrium of the whole
world. Yet he left us in no doubt as to what he considered the most important
clause in his will and what stood out in his mind as his most important
transaction. He said: A story is told of Queen Victoria that is said to be authentic. When she occupied her castle at Balmoral, Scotland, she was in the habit of calling in a friendly way on certain cottagers living in the neighbourhood. One aged Highland woman, who felt greatly honoured by these visits and who knew the Lord, was anxious about the spiritual state of the queen. As the season came to a close one year, Her Majesty was making her last visit to the humble home of this dear child of God. After the good-byes were said, the old cottager timidly inquired, “May I ask your gracious Majesty a question?” “Yes,” replied the queen, “as many as you like.” “Will your Majesty meet me in heaven?” Instantly, the royal visitor replied, “I will, through the all-availing blood of Jesus.” The poet and hymn writer, William Cowper, put it like this: There
is a fountain filled with blood, drawn from Immanuel’s veins, Such language may seem a little grotesque in today’s society where we associate blood with all the mayhem we see constantly on television. However, to those with understanding and with the humility to recognise their greatest need, it contains the most important truth and glorious news that is available to this weary planet.
|
Foreword Part 1: What the Bible says about the cross Images
of the cross from the Old Testament The
cross in the Gospels The
cross in Acts Benefits
of the cross The
cross in Hebrews Why
the cross is not popular
|
||||||||||||||